@pluralistic

Establishment Economists explaining the Central Bank setting interest rates at 20%, causing massive unemployment, collapse in the housing market, widespread small business failures, and suicides among small business owners and unemployed;

"Well last months M1 and M2 Money Supply numbers combined with high employment were at levels econmists and Central Bankers consider potentially inflationary so they had to do it."

#USPolitics #cdnpoli #ukpolitics #capitalism #economics

+ -
+ -
@pluralistic Micheal Hudson is a remarkable economist. His chief contribution, the study of debt and money since earliest human civilization. The basic math regarding usury vs real production is the former grows exponentially without limit, everything else plateaus.

The financialization is the banking sector doing to the domestic economy what the U.S./IMF has done to the world; a giant Ponzi scheme, neoliberalism helped legitimize. Deep history is rhyming with a climate+debt collapse

🧵

+ -

Long thread/3

I once had an economist send me an email to explain how misguided it was to focus on executive pay. Sure (he wrote), executives might be taking home eye-popping sums, but these weren't really coming at the expense of their workers' wellbeing.

3/

+ -

Long thread/4

Just do the math: take those whopping CEO pay-packages and parcel them out to the hundreds of thousands of workers at Fortune 100 companies, and you'll find that each worker's paycheck is just a few dollars larger. Hacking away at CEO pay is an act of spite, not justice.

Meanwhile (the economist continued), just look at where those giant paydays are coming from: stock grants, not salaries.

4/

+ -

Long thread/5

In the bad old days, CEOs' millions came in the form of cash. That incentivized short-term thinking, since anything the CEO did to goose the quarterly numbers would translate into a cash bonus, even if it set the company up for failure in the years to come. But if a CEO's payout comes long after their decisions - if their stock grants don't vest for three or four years - then the CEO's incentives are aligned with long-term sustainability, which is good for everyone.

5/

Long thread/5

@pluralistic The CEO's incentives are aligned with the long-term sustainability of the stock price, not the company or society or even "the economy." What's worse of course is that it is not even aligned with the long-term sustainability of the stock price, just the sustainability of the stock price to the exact date of the vesting. But what do I know?

Long thread/6

It's all nonsense, of course - every bit of it.

Take the question of whether controlling CEO pay is useful as a matter separate from the impact it has on workers' wages. In our society, money is power, and the more money any individual is allowed to amass, the more power they amass. This power is then mobilized to acquire more money, and thus more power. Before you know it, the ultrawealthy are perverting every democratic institution we have.

6/